Thinker
2 readings
Reuben Binns
Thinker · 2 readings
Binns examines what it takes to justify automated decisions to affected people. Prediction and explanation cannot replace contestable reasons and meaningful authority to reconsider an outcome.
All readings
2 readings · Title A–Z
Guided course · Module 14 · Lesson 88
A map you can keep revising
The garden dispute from lesson 1 returns, now examined through Socratic questioning and public reason. The course ends by building a source-grounded comparison that records disagreement and stays open to revision.
Guided course · Module 14 · Lesson 85
Who is responsible when a decision is automated?
When a ranking system decides who gets a training place, who must answer for the decision? With Binns and Nissenbaum, the lesson asks what prediction, explanation and human review leave unresolved about justification and repair.