Skip to content

Text

1 reading

Evolving Concepts of Epistemic Injustice

Text · 1 reading

Fricker’s later discussion refines the differences between prejudiced misjudgment, uneven shared understanding and deliberate discrediting. It also clarifies how her position differs from stronger claims for standpoint advantages.

All readings

1 reading · Title A–Z

Guided course · Module 13 · Lesson 78
Who is heard, and who is treated as credible?
Fricker separates prejudice against a speaker from gaps in shared understanding and proposes remedies; Harding argues for changing where inquiry begins. The lesson adds that a starting point still needs testing.